From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  9 16:10:20 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B902DD
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 16:10:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay.andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [78.134.40.50])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCC5267F
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 16:10:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 47659 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2014 16:10:17 -0000
Received: from alex.andxor.it (a.premoli@andxor.it@192.168.2.30)
 by relay.andxor.it with ESMTPSA; 9 Jun 2014 16:10:17 -0000
Message-ID: <5395DC69.6040109@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:10:17 +0200
From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>, sbruno@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gcc vs gcc48
References: <1402327321.76875.8.camel@bruno> <5395D387.8020902@FreeBSD.org>
 <1402328895.76875.11.camel@bruno> <5395DA0F.1000107@madpilot.net>
 <5395DAD9.8010701@FreeBSD.org> <5395DBCA.7030101@madpilot.net>
In-Reply-To: <5395DBCA.7030101@madpilot.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6.1_pre20140112
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports list <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:10:20 -0000

Guido Falsi ha scritto:
> I agree, but there is a consistency problem, different systems WILL
> behave differently, for a good reason though :)

I'd add that currently if you are using ports instead of packages is
because you WANT a different behavior ;-)

-- 
Alex Dupre