From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 13 00:15:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9921065672; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32588FC16; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AEAE6209; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:15:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=gJC95oEqPFyd PxKhOGrYzUyGTDw=; b=lxgw94TUBeTsBgWu2YSPBvEpRbjQcuqTJny+hvnZIiFU tHpeqewHNhRiny1zu6kxuMq9MtveVpYMV4ARIwScFH5LK/wbqs3do4spXmz+aKkU 53to5Y0Rb5TCj5DjChXujp47CaMhTdshe6DkZOlXc6EOfhSTZZzvq5AgNt8lf64= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=Mq2NRg aaRj5CQxemqhNyn9XyA4O4PRCSn1UIY2zSw8JCM6SkjRIxcya2ZbuKOMw6ShJ5Ce WDDQnMskQEeJF3RIQ+eyWgORWCB3/3TW1oi305p5LAIVWxNAVOcnAbBwhaa+6XMP KmyZZwAc3ftWGIVyez2HIur75sxN5zkzmvenI= Received: from [192.168.1.120] (188-220-36-32.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.36.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D898DE6200; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:15:14 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4EE69911.9040201@cran.org.uk> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:15:13 +0000 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <4EE22421.9060707@gmail.com> <4EE6060D.5060201@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20111212155159.GB73597@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4EE6295B.3020308@cran.org.uk> <20111212170604.GA74044@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4EE692D6.5010208@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4EE692D6.5010208@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "O. Hartmann" , Current FreeBSD , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:15:17 -0000 On 12/12/2011 23:48, O. Hartmann wrote: > Is the tuning of kern.sched.preempt_thresh and a proper method of > estimating its correct value for the intended to use workload > documented in the manpages, maybe tuning()? I find it hard to crawl a > lot of pros and cons of mailing lists for evaluating a correct value > of this, seemingly, important tunable. Note that I said "for example" :) I was suggesting that there may be sysctl's that can be tweaked to improve performance. -- Bruce Cran