From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 19:20:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4138916A41F for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:20:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F101A43D45 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:20:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DDC1A3C1B; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:20:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E7DAC54B90; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:20:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:20:47 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ted Wisniewski Message-ID: <20060118192047.GA47811@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <47A794C0-FE22-46FC-9D81-BCF3359CBD61@measuremap.com> <09FE5498-82E3-495C-9593-8F1CFF3A3BD6@measuremap.com> <200601180803.44265.ted@wiz.plymouth.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601180803.44265.ted@wiz.plymouth.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Michael Barnett Subject: Re: PAE causing system crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:20:49 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:03:44AM -0500, Ted Wisniewski wrote: > You weren't by chance also using NFS? I was, all my other 5.x systems d= id=20 > not use NFS and are stable. I saw this same behavior and wound up going = back=20 > to 4.11 to keep the system stable. Hmm, I didn't notice the 5.4 somehow. Try using 6.0 instead - many important bugs fixed, not to mention the performance improvements. Kris P.S. Don't top-post --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDzpUOWry0BWjoQKURAjECAKDpEt9rWJw9Rt71qH9RPdbadLTEOQCgtrUM C7hMUcp9GqaSMptYYHNltsw= =UA87 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--