From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 2 14:12:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8922816A41F for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:12:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7C643D45 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:12:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA00438 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:10:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma000430; Wed, 2 Nov 05 15:10:54 +0100 Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de (rebelion.Sisis.de [193.31.10.34]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA21294 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:12:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jA2ECB4Q011558 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:12:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:12:11 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051102141211.GA11502@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (i386) Subject: 5.4-REL && RBL of SpamAssassin 3.0.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: guru@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 14:12:18 -0000 Hello, Somehow the RBL tests of SpamAssassin 3.0.2 from the ports collection are not working and I don't understand why after hours of debugging :-(( the DNS itself is ok: Nov 2 14:54:35 spamd[11272]: debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes Nov 2 14:54:35 spamd[11272]: debug: Net::DNS version: 0.48 Nov 2 14:54:35 spamd[11272]: debug: trying (3) cingular.com... Nov 2 14:54:35 spamd[11272]: debug: looking up NS for 'cingular.com' Nov 2 14:54:35 spamd[11272]: debug: NS lookup of cingular.com succeeded => Dns available (set dns_available to hardcode) Nov 2 14:54:35 spamd[11272]: debug: is DNS available? 1 and about RBL the debug log says: Nov 2 14:54:57 spamd[11273]: debug: RBL: success for 14 of 14 queries but nothing is mentioned of the test in the report of the mail itself; when I pipe the same test-SPAM through our central SpamAssassin (3.0.0 on Linux) it says in the report: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=15.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_99,BIZ_TLD, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_50_60,HTML_FONTCOLOR_CYAN, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_JAVASCRIPT,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_OBFUSCATE_00_10,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HEAD,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER, NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=unavailable version=3.0.0-r6932 X-Spam-Report: * 0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name ... * 3.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP addre ss * [12.216.203.209 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * 2.0 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org * [] What's going wrong? matthias -- Matthias Apitz / Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g / D-82041 Oberhaching Fon: ++49 89 / 61308-351, Fax: -399, Mobile ++49 170 4527211 http://www.sisis.de/