From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Sep 19 19:57:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-emulation Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA21083 for emulation-outgoing; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 19:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA21057 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 19:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id TAA02907 for emulation@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 19:57:49 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 19:57:49 -0700 From: Sean Eric Fagan Message-Id: <199609200257.TAA02907@kithrup.com> To: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New doscmd available for testing/munching Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Despite promises to the contrary, I haven't been able to incorporate >Sean's latest kernel work into this snapshot, as it doesn't work yet, >and we haven't been able to sort out why. Well, I just tested my new kernel with the last (not most current) doscmd, and it passed my two tests: ./doscmd /ls -l ./doscmd -bx (and, let me tell you: seeing the "Enter date" prompt in the little window is thrilling. I know we can do it with pcemu, but this is using *my* kernel changes, and *msmith's* doscmd, and I think it's much more exciting ;).) I've placed the diffs in freebsd.org:~ftp/pub/sef/vm86-diffs-960919. As usual, these are relative to 2.1.5-RELEASE. (To answer another question: I am using 2.1.5-RELEASE as my base because I am introducing lots of potental bugs into the kernel, and I would rather use something very stable. This way, any crash I run into I can be 90% certain is due to my code, not something in -current ;).) Sean.