From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 8 11:49:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEFF16A4CF for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:49:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av11-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av11-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA1243D55 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:49:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av11-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C61BE37E43; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:49:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.180]) by av11-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B371937E42 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:49:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A51A37E49 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:49:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 41401 invoked by uid 1001); 8 Sep 2004 11:49:19 -0000 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:49:19 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Simon Strandman Message-ID: <20040908114919.GA41371@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Simon Strandman , current@freebsd.org References: <1094643599.10573.2.camel@Isidor> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1094643599.10573.2.camel@Isidor> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.org 6.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 11:49:24 -0000 On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 01:39:59PM +0200, Simon Strandman wrote: > Hi! > > X.org 6.8 was released earlier this day. Will it make it into 5.3? I don't think it is officially released yet, although I believe the release is scheduled for later today. It seems unlikely that it will make it into 5.3 since the ports tree has already been frozen in preparation for 5.3, and an update of X is so potentially disruptive that it seems unlikely that portmgr will allow the update before ports tree is tagged. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se