From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 19:42:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A53DE01 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 19:42:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C91042CCD for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 19:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHXXo-1VWYUW2eZ2-003OUB for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 21:42:40 +0200 Message-ID: <52530EB1.4010301@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 21:42:41 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/apr1 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:72vW+Sabjlt4RMVP5m+VOHBVfLxepICgQg1vYv+IuJ7vsuqp4Dt iQFteQfaNlLl7yff96WXYtlM05ToOTUi/5SLQQTsu/57vRHJrXe+cYFERejWQsHsq7rSnxf ue3qHQWIV9V6YXtr+pP+l+WprkI3SUpQxhnDGdWWAkTHutosjIHXd5CeEvk5usrOst7pInB D2thMk3DPsnqkWLtMf/FA== Cc: John Bolton X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 19:42:43 -0000 On 2013-10-07 20:05, John Bolton wrote: > Hi guys, > > I ran into some trouble building this port on FreeBSD 9.1 x64 using the -D arguments so the build does not require user interaction. The command line I used is: > > make -D BATCH -D WITH_LDAP package > > Unfortunately, the build proceeds without LDAP support. I noticed the Makefule does not contain an OPTIONS_DEFINE line. The build worked as expected after modifying the Makefile to include this line. The version of apr1 I am building is 1.4.8. > > What do you guys thinks about this? > > Regards, > > John Bolton Hello John, I'm not sure if the new OPTIONS framework covers all cases, but the new notation is working as expected https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG > make -D BATCH -D WITH=LDAP package also with disabling a default option > make -D BATCH -D WITH="LDAP PGSQL" WITHOUT="GDBM" package -- Regards, olli