From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 04:31:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44D6ECA3 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 04:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF4997C for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 04:31:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=SFNkjc2quhBN5Bzo7cpHfjs6xgeKVw8D8vDBhhmbs9c=; b=x67uqvIVxxvC20o/QS3bTLv0iGd8dZuHWhsnRoyyoxyoL8SU7PDNMo5ENrfByfjXcxHIoDZpsmhRuBsZ7fAXJsz66sZL4KB5rOLXTQ3efTJ8c4LrtlFK/13inYGIsK6uv3z6IRjpPte87+mCm8bcJ9u3kzdCV351opEaNYL0toA=; Received: from [114.121.130.53] (port=58795 helo=B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YEsNL-0047gK-0j; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:31:12 -0700 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:31:04 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: "Michael W. Lucas" Subject: Re: preferred jail management tool Message-ID: <20150124123104.1b7fc1be@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20150123210026.GA45086@mail.michaelwlucas.com> References: <20150123210026.GA45086@mail.michaelwlucas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: jail@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 04:31:21 -0000 Hi, my preferred jail management tools are my own scripts. I think that it is a matter on the number of jails someone needs and how different they are. Learning first a tool to manage jails means that you also have to learn jails or you will only use the features supported by the management tool you have taken. Erich On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:00:26 -0500 "Michael W. Lucas" wrote: > Hi, > > For those who haven't heard, I'm writing a book on jails. Some details > are at http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives/2286. > > I want to cover at least one jail management tool. I've done some > research into jail tools. You can see my results at > http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives/2291. > > (No, I'm not trying to drag traffic to my blog. I just don't want to > cut-and-paste it to a mailing list. ;-) > > I have several choices of jail management tools to write about. It > seems that ezjail gets all the press. I'm wondering if this is because > it's the first tool, or if it's the best of its kind. > > I also hear a lot of whinging about ezjail. I suspect that's because > it's the most widely deployed tool of it's type, however. The one in > front gets the most mud slung at it. > > Looking at the documentation, I'm highly intrigued by iocage. It seems > to do everything that ezjail does and then some. > > CBSD also looks like a really good choice. Based on what I know now, > I'm inclined to cover iocage and CBSD. > > I want to ask the experts, though. Which is you guys. > > Any recommendations on what I should cover, or not cover? Any big > screaming red flags in these tools that I should be aware of? > > Thanks, > ==ml >