From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 07:20:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73FF16A4CE for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 07:20:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A6644008 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 07:20:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA9FKMFY051041 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 07:20:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hA9FKMvo051040; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 07:20:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 07:20:22 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <200311091520.hA9FKMvo051040@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Tim Bishop Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586E116A4CE for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 07:15:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.kent.ac.uk (mx1.ukc.ac.uk [129.12.21.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA4843FE0 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 07:15:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from t.d.bishop@kent.ac.uk) Received: from pendennis.ukc.ac.uk ([129.12.3.232]) by mx1.kent.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AIrHv-00078k-1O; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 15:15:39 +0000 Received: from tdb by pendennis.ukc.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AIrHu-0009WB-Rd; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 15:15:38 +0000 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 15:15:38 +0000 From: Tim Bishop Sender: "T.D.Bishop" To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 cc: tim@bishnet.net Subject: ports/59082: Fix port: security/f-prot X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tim Bishop List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 15:20:25 -0000 >Number: 59082 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Fix port: security/f-prot >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: maintainer-update >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Nov 09 07:20:20 PST 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Tim Bishop >Release: FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE i386 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD pendennis.ukc.ac.uk 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #5: Wed Sep 17 15:50:07 BST 2003 tdb@pendennis.ukc.ac.uk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PENDENNIS i386 >Description: Fix the md5 sum for this port's distfile. I've compared the old and new tarballs, and the only difference seems to be the definition files (which are binary, so I can't really compare them) This worries me slightly because I suspect they periodically rebuild the tarball with new definition files. Is there a solution to a problem like this? >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: Apply patch below. --- f-prot-4.2.0-md5fix.diff begins here --- diff -ruN f-prot.bak/distinfo f-prot/distinfo --- f-prot.bak/distinfo Wed Oct 22 04:08:51 2003 +++ f-prot/distinfo Sun Nov 9 15:11:02 2003 @@ -1 +1 @@ -MD5 (fp-freebsd-ws-4.2.0.tar.gz) = e775217b9d1eba2b9f0faeed6fd4e33f +MD5 (fp-freebsd-ws-4.2.0.tar.gz) = 2138b4f31b531f40983d5a4caf40b11d --- f-prot-4.2.0-md5fix.diff ends here --- >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: