From owner-cvs-all Fri Nov 2 11:41:20 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D0137B403; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (robert@fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id fA2Jf7B27446; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:41:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:41:07 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Assar Westerlund Cc: tardis@watson.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern syscalls.master In-Reply-To: <5lwv19ufv9.fsf@assaris.sics.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2 Nov 2001, Assar Westerlund wrote: > Robert Watson writes: > > My understanding was that pioctl() served a different function from > > afs_syscall. If that is incorrect, I can easily back out the change, as I > > have not MFC'd it. > > pioctl and afs_syscall are different names for the same system call. As > to what the system call should really be called, I don't know, probably > afs_syscall. Ok, so that suggests the following course of action: (1) Rename pioctl to afs_syscall (2) Remove the new afs_syscall I added Any objections? Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message