From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 23:00:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3E710656B3; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gordon@tetlows.org) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532E48FC1A; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so2600336qwc.13 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:00:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.40.198 with SMTP id l6mr4038582qae.47.1301351696907; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.27.6 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:34:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110328160101.11a439c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110328160101.11a439c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:34:56 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gordon Tetlow To: Tom Rhodes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bringing service monitoring into base X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:00:24 -0000 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Tom Rhodes wrote: > Hi, > > So a handful of people have reviewed, used, are using, and seem > to like my services monitoring stuff found here: > > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~trhodes/fsc > > Up there I have a port (may or not be written correctly); > A tarball of the files; some patches against FreeBSD's rc > to add support for startup and shutdown; and even a Makefile > you can use to install the software. > > I've been running it at home on both CURRENT and STABLE for > awhile and it appears pretty solid. =A0Now I'd like to bring it > into base and let everyone else make use of/modify/improve it. > > Unless there are any serious objectionss, I'll pull it in this > coming weekend; perhaps Saturday or Sunday after an update > and yet another build test. =A0Thanks, I would think that fscadm should go into /usr/sbin since you have to be root to run it. Correspondingly, the manpage should be in section 8. The Makefile infrastructure looks to hardcode paths which I assume would be fixed up by importing it into the tree. I'll see if I can take a closer look at it tonight or tomorrow. Gordon