From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 8 10:47:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3142F106564A for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 10:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yh0-f54.google.com (mail-yh0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF32E8FC19 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 10:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id s35so834716yhf.13 for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 03:47:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MCBb3tG8NcxAA2ni6gjGE+EVyycpwQx+vPq+JKblHG8=; b=rsJClxid2JVCDdu7+pRKs4sKIr499+wrsAl8CSNWu3gbKt1uXF8s1hCqZIDCy+GaGM 3arsuvjdiLwGoO4mr1Wmg9WxehNU/eDoR+xGIT/llD7vApNkJTm1R6j0CxX9EH2tE5rP wDgPJkDDXAQSJcsxrBID5RLtKeJQVB0a6TaPE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=MCBb3tG8NcxAA2ni6gjGE+EVyycpwQx+vPq+JKblHG8=; b=TyAAH/GjhOO+uIkAvI5oYm9puLeYzEwkuPejxBvCIKykMGxt3iqqdh/a9L4wc9dldV uEDnP4/jOCcFKhlrXzZi7q3gq1BtR53jJWzp0mSnANap9syGGdumqjUmtckZosgfvUiV IqqAu816MmERuWxT1Qt+z15cR04hCO46dFo1kQWBGkcyQ+WYEV231stgysL58TZxZUfz lJVSI1fCV7oeLqDFrVeDiqkcNnt5vVYL12n8dodtmebqAipp7o6Y/6H28BGAR8EVg3mN HqMbtcS+KPryP7tgKIyREboU+lT14O4UrdXrC94SaCiJleAR1C+/Jew/QUqlnu2ITGlF S3ig== Received: by 10.236.191.6 with SMTP id f6mr15160274yhn.126.1349693235397; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 03:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a6sm16721287anm.22.2012.10.08.03.47.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 08 Oct 2012 03:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3XZyv41pfBz2CG5b for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 06:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 06:47:11 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20121008064711.507a402e@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20121008024233.46787.qmail@joyce.lan> References: <15743.1349654499@tristatelogic.com> <20121008024233.46787.qmail@joyce.lan> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFK8V8cZabD1eQJ6W1dEhb1ws8p22JFu8wgvSuvrFyp4Y97JD01ZSO9h0zJGLop8qEa13a Subject: Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 10:47:22 -0000 On 8 Oct 2012 02:42:33 -0000 John Levine articulated: > > ... Note that setting the BATCH environment variable to yes will > > answer yes to any prompts during this process, removing the need > > for manual intervention during the build process. > > > >(This was said with respect to upgrading ports via portupgrade.) > > Or you can use portmaster, which runs through all the ports first and > does the config dialogs before starting the rebuild. There are stil > a few places it can get stuck, but many fewer than portupgrade. > > Portmaster is worth a look just out of amazement. It is a 4,000 line > shell script. While you are at it, you might want to give "portmanager" a spin. While it can be a bit of a monster when used with the "-p" flag, I have found it capable of fixing problems and building ports that portupgrade and potmaster both choked on. As always, read the documentation thoroughly first. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ All's well that ends.