From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 22:03:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C948C20 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 22:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE964B3B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 22:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4] (may be forged)) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id s29M322W016439; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 23:03:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 09 Mar 2014 23:03:02 +0100 Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 23:03:02 +0100 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: Mirza Kolakovic Subject: Re: xfm 1.5 ? Message-ID: <20140309220302.GA16346@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 22:03:05 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mirza Kolakovic wrote: > Is there a plan to transition xfm to 1.5? x11-fm/xfm currently lacks a maintainer, so you/we will have to wait for someone to pick it up and see if it can easily be updated to version 1.5. I might be able to have a look at it, but I probably won't have time to fix a port with a whole heap of problems. If you feel up to it, you are of course quite welcome to see if you can update the port and to consider becoming its new maintainer. AvW --=20 I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTHOUVAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe80P8QALEXXI62FWIblS3VrH001CAK 1f+qNnkxmkupijrVmMnefjOOk9Ww0WKBqv3acR6+soJ0mh7I//7jI8mNXT3iEFYK GS/WQGzmrC4kbY8+8b26My8Aenxf9gRA4KtBghbGyYhFKW1LV+l2u4kn2CmDrb51 lh++hjcrJGPSoOkGsdoZiKplFlhdNdjK7O9bCM57033MfJ/xydc6UBA0uDUV7CVa 5/O9b6sGuLgCESyfPjtVQAoqzPMGNhLRWr2Wjpw4kk2JIHdBNMhv3Tp3lsab2NI3 qcVgEwN65srD7lBngqsL7e5Xya21Ni/yFXAWK/Dz7Lepk3xUdF1Rrxb0w7g9CqkY 7qOpgJR/b8I7l/1iF21ZKx8Gf+dJLS/6ELlQBxcUn3jJ9ThRgDliHbSG9RZ1sI2w T3aW0cx137qyXCGZSrH4Vhf7GQhxUH+FlyIPyTj4WGSEyvmUt7Thk+otHzuDmrEb aNjVz9cpVlMFSU/VGYN3fTMImJ+BGB2f7rU+4GRuU8M7zxh3IcAyknSx2bk/gRYv om3DTvqkCekmUJ1tjkNnDeO92dcInC3b2FjlUlLbeAN2MvPT+rRokxs7vvS++HbD eLUawwMzxlC9bhbTKhTZmEEQA8HgF4ZotGPDBc6IwY+zyqIxq4NSbr4uF3jwLmRo A3ddLEUuQWCB5PN/a5Yn =msqa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--