From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 30 20:08:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD4616A47B for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958A343CC0 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:08:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so2013014uge for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:08:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=MBcaB+/+wDuH0lImCm1F7vESOVXXnjD24v9+ER6i9TW3zAVFvj9rx4ySqITgdfeFV/vf71+Z3l0ocXDPrA1k12MRQgmCj05qL6FXYqKyNb9awBNDWtUCtQXcYazMUtwfssz0yp/DhFMBfcoYACbE3cqbDydQdJmZChPgEjDlAsU= Received: by 10.66.255.7 with SMTP id c7mr6034996ugi.1164917326941; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.237.14 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:08:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <755cb9fc0611301208w1ff93987m88885b3b59444373@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:08:46 +0000 From: "Alexandre Vieira" To: "Miles Nordin" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <755cb9fc0611290724q127f006va84f3457c48443b6@mail.gmail.com> <456E8D8B.8010102@orel.ru> <755cb9fc0611300454s4d28ad14rd402cba8388d49@mail.gmail.com> <14989d6e0611300700n3ac073bayc4584f2b1020ee61@mail.gmail.com> <755cb9fc0611300839y6deed1ceqf452018cc2f73737@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Netra T1 105 (sparc64) optimization X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:08:54 -0000 On 11/30/06, Miles Nordin wrote: > > >>>>> "av" == Alexandre Vieira writes: > > av> polling increased dramaticly the latency for all traffic that > av> passes trough the bridge and reduced the transmission rate > av> also. > > That's interesting. What do you mean by transmission rate? Are you > seeing dropped packets? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > No, it just doesn't transfer as many as it does without polling. Without polling it transfers like 8MB/s, with polling it does less than this and there is twice the latency. -- Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com