From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 29 17:55:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F09B16A719 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 17:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch [213.160.32.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42BF43D79 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 17:55:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616D02E07D for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 19:55:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at atlantis.intranet Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlantis.intranet [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCyBBa-mlEMc for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 19:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mini.intranet (mini.intranet [10.0.0.17]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6A82E07C for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 19:55:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Benjamin Lutz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:55:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 X-Face: $Ov27?7*N,h60fIEfNJdb!m,@#4T/d; 1hw|W0zvsHM(a$Yn6BYQ0^SEEXvi8>D`|V*F"_+R 2@Aq>+mNb4`,'[[%z9v0Fa~]AD1}xQO3|>b.z&}l#R-_(P`?@Mz"kS; XC>Eti,i3>%@g?4f,\c7|Gh wb&ky$b2PJ^\0b83NkLsFKv|smL/cI4UD%Tu8alAD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4588008.jnRuXPsEh4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605291955.42995.benlutz@datacomm.ch> Subject: Linux apps, PREFIX and POLA X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:55:58 -0000 --nextPart4588008.jnRuXPsEh4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I'm just about to finish the update for the linux-enemyterritory port. Then= I=20 started thinking about the PREFIX. Currently it uses X11BASE. An opinion th= at=20 I've noticed growing in popularity is that we should move away from X11BASE= =20 towards LOCALBASE. The porters handbook states that a port should use X11BA= SE=20 it if it uses X11 files or links against libs. Now while Enemy Territory obviously does require X11, it actually links=20 against the linux version of the X11 libs. I suppose it'd be possible to ru= n=20 it without a FreeBSD X11 installed, just with a Linux X11. So my question i= s:=20 Should I move linux-enemyterritory from X11BASE to LOCALBASE? Would such a= =20 move violate POLA, ie will anyone notice the change, and care about it? Cheers Benjamin --nextPart4588008.jnRuXPsEh4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEezWegShs4qbRdeQRAg5sAJ9SEqWsy5YpnjAGy5/PVo+MLDE3WQCgheOM 1fCai2tnug07Km+0Mvv0T3E= =EVeK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4588008.jnRuXPsEh4--