From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 4 11:12:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from icicle.winternet.com (icicle.winternet.com [198.174.169.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005FD150B9 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:11:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nrahlstr@mail.winternet.com) Received: (from adm@localhost) by icicle.winternet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA24747; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 13:11:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from tundra.winternet.com(198.174.169.11) by icicle.winternet.com via smap (V2.0) id xma024726; Thu, 4 Mar 99 13:11:08 -0600 Received: (from nrahlstr@localhost) by tundra.winternet.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) id NAA18982; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 13:11:08 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <19990304131108.E15184@winternet.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 13:11:08 -0600 From: Nathan Ahlstrom To: Robert Fleming , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: y2k on early releases of freebsd References: <36DEB49A.F2A2A165@imall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <36DEB49A.F2A2A165@imall.com>; from Robert Fleming on Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 09:28:10AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Robert Fleming wrote: > We are currently runing more that 30+ servers in a production web > environment with version from > FreeBSD 2.2.5 > FreeBSD 2.2.7 > FreeBSD 2.2.8 > FreeBSD 2.2-980305-SNAP > > We need recomendations on what should be done if anything with regard > to the os releases that we are using. At minimum I think that you should move up to 2.2.8-STABLE. That has all known Y2K bugs fixed in it. There is currently a Y2K audit in progress (http://www.freebsd.org/~danny/) and any problems found will be fixed in 2.2-STABLE, 3.1-STABLE, and -CURRENT. Nathan -- Nathan Ahlstrom nrahlstr@winternet.com http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message