From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 18 18:30:34 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA29773 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 18:30:34 -0700 Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA29765 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 18:30:33 -0700 Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14419(5)>; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 18:02:56 PDT Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <49864>; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 18:02:49 -0700 X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6epsilon 4/13/95 To: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com (James Leppek) cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, karl@mcs.net, kozowski@structured.net Subject: Re: PPP and dynamic IPs drifting a little In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Apr 95 10:41:38 PDT." <9504181741.AA05651@borg.ess.harris.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 18:02:35 PDT From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <95Apr18.180249pdt.49864@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <9504181741.AA05651@borg.ess.harris.com> you write: >Well, I tried to ping those to confirm they are never in use and >I got an answer! Then I tried 192.168.1.2 and it answered!! > >So what is the scoop on those numbers and RFC1597? It looks like structured.net and net99 are advertising 192.168.1.x to the Internet (well, MAE-EAST, at least), in violation of RFC1597. They should stop. Bill