From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 23 15:42:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D196916A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:42:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E35843D58 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:42:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1345978wri for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:42:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=uC/EfqtEo5mWf7QXOIym9CFIxPDSpp5SSV5NdJmf12FmVMAN8Ulz6rh680a0tVcSShd8LPb7pn1CQpXCv331S6+axIEYjBODBG0mrUlF2JyZMTQh6NpOpcPQGLlxC09cJm6vI+JolGqqS1ZrxxrzSySYDhfGvtneAbkh434hKGk= Received: by 10.54.3.52 with SMTP id 52mr123256wrc; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:42:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.4.22 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:42:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:42:14 +0000 From: Freminlins To: Jorn Argelo In-Reply-To: <20050223152920.M33473@wcborstel.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050223152920.M33473@wcborstel.nl> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Freminlins List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:42:17 -0000 On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:36:36 +0100, Jorn Argelo wrote: > I don't think that they would. That'll be a massive migration involving lots > and lots of costs. They have to pay for RedHat Enterprise too. The only reason > I can think off is that they want support.Perhaps I missed a part, but I don't > see the word FreeBSD in that article. Although it doesn't state FreeBSD, I understand that Yahoo! runs stuff on FreeBSD. > Besides, the point of the article is not regarding a migration of Yahoo, but > Linux and IT in general. It has nothing to do with Yahoo or FreeBSD. I think > that the author of the article is simply mistaking. I'n not sure I agree with that. The author stated "But in December, Yahoo started to port ... to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.0" That would suggest that Yahoo! is moving to Linux. I am very interested in this as I have for several years used the argument "we use the same OS as Yahoo!". We're not going to migrate to Linux if Yahoo! does. > Jorn. Frem.