From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 30 01:16:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF50716A4DD for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@rithy4u.net) Received: from ix.khmerserver.net (ygmsmtp.khmerserver.net [203.82.224.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FA943D5A for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:16:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@rithy4u.net) Received: from khsvrpckh001cio ([192.168.1.112]) by ix.khmerserver.net (rithy4uMailServer) with SMTP id k7U1Ahmu025958 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:10:47 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from root@rithy4u.net) YGLCResent-Message-Id: <200608300110.k7U1Ahmu025958@ix.khmerserver.net> YGLCMessage-Id: <200608300110.k7U1Ahmu025958@ix.khmerserver.net> Message-ID: <000a01c6cbd1$80ff3490$7001a8c0@khmerserver.net> From: "rithy4u- CEO" To: Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:13:25 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-YGMC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact YGMC IT Dept X-YGMC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-YGMC-MailScanner-From: root@rithy4u.net X-YGMC-MailScanner-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:39:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD router X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:16:57 -0000 Dear all, I want to know, between Cisco Router and a compiled of FreeBSD Router whi= ch one is better? Is it posible to build a Router Appliance on FreeBSD inst= ead of using ISO of Cisco? Richard Ben, CIO --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.