From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 6 05:17:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F3B16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 May 2004 05:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED6E43D1D for ; Thu, 6 May 2004 05:17:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from DeepCore.dk (sos.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.130]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i46CGmUw059557; Thu, 6 May 2004 14:16:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <409A2CB1.9030308@DeepCore.dk> Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 14:16:49 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040329) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Forrest Aldrich References: <409906DF.4040908@forrie.com> In-Reply-To: <409906DF.4040908@forrie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.4 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA Support gone bad? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 12:17:43 -0000 Forrest Aldrich wrote: > I recently updated my FreeBSD 5.2 system to CURRENT via CVSup, and then > the system wasn't recognizing the secondary (slave) SATA drives. I > thought this might be a hardware issue, so brought it in to be looked > at. Turn out, it's fine with other operating systems (Windows/XP, et > al). So I'm presuming something with SATA support went bad in the > current codebase. Has anyone information about this or a fix. Please at least provide the output from dmesg so I have a chance to see what kind of HW we are talking about. A dmesg from a working kernel would be real handy as well... -- -Søren