From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 23 16:37:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF0216A400 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:37:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster4.tls.net (ecluster4.tls.net [65.196.224.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAB8243D4C for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:37:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 27823 invoked by uid 89); 23 Mar 2006 16:37:41 -0000 Received: from 64-184-8-175.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.102?) (ldg%tls.net@64.184.8.175) by auth-ecluster4.tls.net with SMTP; 23 Mar 2006 16:37:41 -0000 Message-ID: <4422CEC7.20202@pixelhammer.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:37:27 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060322215534.8C53243D48@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <4422B95F.8070504@pixelhammer.com> <71c6240a736c14a3e1862bce8082caf4@arved.at> <4422BFAD.2020605@pixelhammer.com> In-Reply-To: <4422BFAD.2020605@pixelhammer.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Sendmail patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:37:43 -0000 DAve wrote: > Tilman Linneweh wrote: >> >> On Mar 23, 2006, at 16:06, DAve wrote: >>>>>> bash-2.05b# make >>>>>> "/usr/src/lib/libsm/Makefile", line 11: Malformed conditional >>>>>> (${MK_INET6_SUPPORT} != "no") >>>>> "/usr/src/lib/libsm/Makefile", line 13: >>>>>> if-less endif "/usr/src/lib/libsm/Makefile", line 13: Need >>>>> an operator >>>>>> make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue >>>>>> >>>>>> I used the patch for 4.11 and 5.3 >>>>>> >> >> If upgrading to a supported Release isn't an option, you may get away >> with updating your "make" before trying to >> build the new sendmail. >> >> Another alternative might be, to use the sendmail from the ports >> collection. > > Arrg! This should not be this difficult. Updating an entire server seems > like a bit of overkill for a Sendmail patch. Though it is an opportunity > to go back to 4.X. > > Dave > I'll look at the port which is already updated. Thanks, DAve -- This message was checked by forty monkeys and found to not contain any SPAM whatsoever. Your monkeys may vary