From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 12:32:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E49916A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:32:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D2943D31 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:32:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DFtQ5-00034q-3K; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:32:39 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DFtQ1-00072r-L1; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:32:33 +0100 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:32:33 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Yuri?= In-Reply-To: <20050326224344.4152110C83@relay2.beelinegprs.ru> Message-ID: References: <20050326224344.4152110C83@relay2.beelinegprs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Jan Grant X-Spam-Score: -2.8 X-Spam-Level: -- cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About FreeBSD and Solaris X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:32:40 -0000 On Sat, 27 Mar 2005, Yuri wrote: > I've installed Solaris 10 for x86 some time before just to taste it > since I heard a lot about it but never tryed. Solaris seemed to be > very slow in comparision to FBSD. To be honest I expected much more > from a commercial OS than I sow in Solaris. Maybe I just didn't get > something? What you think? >From my experience of it thus far, 10 is the first solaris on intel that doesn't suck; even on a UP box. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287864 or +44 (0)117 9287088 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Semantic rules, OK?