From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 00:27:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B508106566C; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.farley.org (mail.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:14d3:2::11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA078FC15; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thor.farley.org (HPooka@thor.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:14d3:1::5]) by mail.farley.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9M0RPgi082607; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:27:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:27:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <4EA1D2D7.7050203@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <201110211354.p9LDsHBD027058@svn.freebsd.org> <4EA1D2D7.7050203@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (BSF 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.farley.org Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Gleb Smirnoff , src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r226614 - head/share/man/man9 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:27:27 -0000 On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Doug Barton wrote: > On 10/21/2011 06:54, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > >> +It is not possible to guard allocations that really expect >> theirselves to be > > s/theirselves/themselves/ Running this through aspell should have > caught this. :) ispell says it is OK. It is in /usr/share/dict/web2. Of course, "themselves" is much more commonly used while "theirselves" appears to be more logical[1]. :) Sean 1. http://color-connection.com/EngVW/Lessons/lesson1.htm -- scf@FreeBSD.org