From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Dec 17 15:54:16 1994 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id PAA20614 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 17 Dec 1994 15:54:16 -0800 Received: from kryten.atinc.com (kryten.atinc.com [198.138.38.7]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA20608; Sat, 17 Dec 1994 15:54:11 -0800 Received: (jmb@localhost) by kryten.atinc.com (8.6.9/8.3) id SAA09273; Sat, 17 Dec 1994 18:50:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Dec 1994 18:50:40 -0500 (EST) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" Subject: Re: Tripwire for FreeBSD 2.0? To: Matt Midboe cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199412172201.QAA07908@magellan.iquest.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 17 Dec 1994, Matt Midboe wrote: > I'm curious if anyone has gotten Tripwire 1.1 to make it through the > tests on FreeBSD 2.0. It makes just fine for me, but when I go to run it > through the tests it fails at the first one. It says "Expecting 0 got 8" > most specifically. I noticed when I compiled I got some warnings from > endian.h, so is this a byte ordering problem? dont do tripwire1.1. the newer version 1.2, fixes a problem with the ntohl() and htonl() that are included in the tripwire1.1 distrubution. works fine on 1.1.5.1, but you'll need to create a database file for 2.0 when i get a 2.0 box going, i'll take a look if you have done this already. (think it was htonl(), but its beena while. at any rate, they were including a function with the same name as a library function and the result would not work. changing the source to use the non-pointer version of the 64 bit encoding routines avoided the problme) Jonathan M. Bresler jmb@kryten.atinc.com | Analysis & Technology, Inc. | 2341 Jeff Davis Hwy play go. | Arlington, VA 22202 ride bike. hack FreeBSD.--ah the good life | 703-418-2800 x346