From owner-freebsd-hardware  Fri Aug 18 08:20:48 1995
Return-Path: hardware-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id IAA03230
          for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 08:20:48 -0700
Received: from silver.sms.fi (silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.1])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA02522
          for <freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 08:15:41 -0700
Received: (from pete@localhost) by silver.sms.fi (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA29469; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 18:03:25 +0300
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 1995 18:03:25 +0300
Message-Id: <199508181503.SAA29469@silver.sms.fi>
From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi>
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: i82424ZX vs i82424TX cache dram controller
In-Reply-To: <199508180616.XAA24364@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
References: <Pine.3.89.9508171006.H3048-0100000@kryten.atinc.com>
	<199508180616.XAA24364@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Sender: hardware-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Rodney W. Grimes writes:

 > > 
 > > 	still no rev message--from looking at source that seems to be in 
 > > -current and 2.0.5R but not in 2.0R
 > 
 > Oopss.. your running old code :-(...

What one should enable to get the verbose probe in 2.2-CURRENT? I get only:
chip0 <Intel 82437 (Triton)> rev 1 on pci0:0
chip1 <Intel 82371 (Triton)> rev 2 on pci0:7

...and I'm wondering whether there is any parity checking on the chipset.
(I've been told that it's unlikely)

Pete