From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 10 07:46:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA4816A41C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:46:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F4843D4C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:46:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5A7kdRH039334; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:46:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 38422-08; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:46:38 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5A7kc2F039331 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:46:38 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.3/8.13.3) id j5A7l6QO078799; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:47:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:47:06 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20050610074706.GE78035@ip.net.ua> References: <20050609234619.AD1F67306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <84dead720506091950779d1661@mail.gmail.com> <86oeae3d8f.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050610071828.GB78035@ip.net.ua> <867jh23bwh.fsf@xps.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nhYGnrYv1PEJ5gA2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <867jh23bwh.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:46:42 -0000 --nhYGnrYv1PEJ5gA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:32:14AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > And if you feel that -fno-strict-aliasing is evil, why not dike it > > out from sys.mk? >=20 > 'ncvs annotate /usr/src/share/mk/sys/mk | grep aliasing' and you'll > realize that any attempt to touch it would result in a huge flamewar. >=20 I don't see a flamewar, only the mention that it breaks some notable ports. If it's not suitable for ports, then we should invent a mean to compile only src/ *without* -fno-strict-aliasing. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --nhYGnrYv1PEJ5gA2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCqUV6qRfpzJluFF4RAtbrAJ4utowmNnXS/jh8g9oPwyiuVTKbsgCdFy6t oANO+zlbeY35X/R2jSxALY4= =zxfP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nhYGnrYv1PEJ5gA2--