From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 10:22:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FEC37B401 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from galilee.polands.org (CPE-24-208-57-240.new.rr.com [24.208.57.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554AE43FAF for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from sheba.polands.org (sheba.polands.org [172.16.1.33]) by galilee.polands.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h77HK2NP040708; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:20:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from sheba.polands.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sheba.polands.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h77HK2wd001356; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:20:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@sheba.polands.org) Received: (from djp@localhost) by sheba.polands.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h77HIfgu001352; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:18:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:18:41 -0500 From: Doug Poland To: Lucas Holt Message-ID: <20030807171841.GA1327@polands.org> References: <3F326499.50501@401.cx> <0D9C0182-C8F5-11D7-A4DD-0030656DD690@foolishgames.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0D9C0182-C8F5-11D7-A4DD-0030656DD690@foolishgames.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISPs blocking SMTP connections from dynamic IP address space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:22:47 -0000 On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:34:45PM -0400, Lucas Holt wrote: > > > I do understand the counter argument about blocking ips.. but i think > thats frustration talking. Even if ip blocking is an improvement, it > won't stop spam. > Agreed, does anyone know why requiring reverse DNS isn't "good enough"? I've asked both AOL and Time Warner but have received no response. -- Regards, Doug