From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jun 9 18:57:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (pc-62-31-42-140-hy.blueyonder.co.uk [62.31.42.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D1D37B405 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 18:57:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) Received: from clan.nothing-going-on.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5A1rbD77109 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 02:53:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Nik Clayton To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: -DNOCLEANDEPENDS the default in ports/Makefile? Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 02:53:37 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01061002533701.77076@clan.nothing-going-on.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, Would anyone have any objection if the top level ports/Makefile defined NOCLEANDEPENDS by default? I can't think of any circumstances where someone would want to do # cd /usr/ports # make clean and have each port try and clean out its own dependencies before moving on to the next one. Since you're going to clean the whole tree anyway it just wastes time. N - -- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjsi0yEACgkQk6gHZCw343UuDQCgkRg2l27yzzr5eFxhY+shB0e+ /uIAn01o+gRJAlF8FfIwJNqelKMFp6C/ =T6lo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message