From owner-cvs-all Fri Oct 26 10:14: 5 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.139.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B03237B403; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id f9QHDrU32358; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:13:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9QGxXY47978; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 17:59:33 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200110261659.f9QGxXY47978@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: John Baldwin Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cu(1) (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.var.dist) References: In-Reply-To: ; from John Baldwin "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 03:09:37 PDT." Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 17:59:33 +0100 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > If we are keeping uucp junk around for cu(1), why is cu(1) not a port? > > Alternatively, what are the desirable features of cu(1) that tip(1) really > > needs to be able to do? > > I can just type 'cu -l /dev/cuaa0 -s 115200' w/o needing to setup an entry in > /etc/remote. i.e., laziness. :) Aaaaah! The thot plickens :-) Do you have a problem with cu being a port and not in the base system? (ie, a port that gives you _just_ cu with no other UUCP crap?) M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message