From owner-cvs-all Sun Oct 28 14: 0:16 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F37C837B403; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 14:00:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 28 Oct 2001 22:00:07 +0000 (GMT) To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Mikhail Teterin , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_dirhash.c In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:39:38 CDT." <20011026113938.D15052@elvis.mu.org> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:00:06 +0000 From: Ian Dowse Message-ID: <200110282200.aa87352@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20011026113938.D15052@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >> My feeling is, the ufs.dirhash_X would be better named as ufs.dirhash.X >> -- some day we may have a nice GUI for browsing this things, and it will >> present the hierarchy based on dots :) (It will also need to know, which >> settings are modifiable, but that's another story). > >Agreed, it should be sort of tree like even though it is MIB. Yeah, probably, though the tree structure works best for places where there is a clean separation between sections such as in net.*. Right now the three dirhash_* sysctls are the only ones under vfs.ufs so I thought it overkill to add an extra "dirhash" node. Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message