From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 25 20:55:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB8C16A402 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:55:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7962813C43E for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:55:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 5424 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jan 2007 20:55:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (216.186.148.249) by smtp6.knology.net with SMTP; 25 Jan 2007 20:55:43 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 02BD72841F; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:55:43 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:55:42 -0600 From: David Kelly To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20070125205542.GA47293@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: Is a re-boot req'd after changing 'resolv.conf' ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:55:45 -0000 On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:15:47PM -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:53 AM, V.I.Victor wrote: > > > >So -- re-boot or not? (Note: this is a static-ip box running v5.4.) > > There is no reason to reboot after changing /etc/resolv.conf. Almost > everything will be using the standard resolver routines from libc and > will pick up the new nameservers just fine. Dhcpclient rewrites /etc/resolv.conf every time it renews the DHCP lease. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.