From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 22:46:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FADE37B401 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hysteria.spc.org (hysteria.spc.org [195.206.69.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C48E843F93 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:46:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bms@hysteria.spc.org) Received: (qmail 4415 invoked by uid 5013); 16 Jul 2003 05:44:19 -0000 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:44:19 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Josh Brooks Message-ID: <20030716054419.GE22295@spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bruce M Simpson , Josh Brooks , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20030715223653.Y36933-100000@mail.econolodgetulsa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030715223653.Y36933-100000@mail.econolodgetulsa.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: running 5.1-RELEASE with no procfs mounted (lockups?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 05:46:29 -0000 On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:43:19PM -0700, Josh Brooks wrote: > I have loaded two 5.1-RELEASE systems, both of them have PROCFS and > PSEUDOFS in the kernel, and yet neither of them have a procfs mounted. I think one of the first things people are going to ask is: which scheduler are you using, SCHED_BSD or SCHED_ULE ? Also, if you could attach a dmesg and kernel configuration file, that may be most helpful. BMS