From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 18 11:00:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766F937B40C for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B752443C0 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:26:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 86762 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2003 17:26:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lucifer.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.2) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2003 17:26:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:26:13 +0200 From: Clement Laforet To: Sergey Matveychuk Message-Id: <20030818192613.59b990aa.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <3F410810.8070307@ciam.ru> References: <3F40EDC7.5050500@ciam.ru> <20030818182248.34b59ac2.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <3F410810.8070307@ciam.ru> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) X-Face: ._cVVRDn#-2((lnfi^P7CoD4htI$4+#G/G)!w|,}H5yK~%(3-C.JlEYbOjJGFwJkt*7N^%z jYeu[;}]}F"3}l5R'l"X0HbvT^D\Q&%deCo)MayY`);TO Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetch-list X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:00:03 -0000 On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 21:08:32 +0400 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > May be I was too short. I meant fetch-list don't show "list of files" > but a list of commands to fetch this files. > Is there a difference? list of names should be, according to the "naming convention", distfiles-list or fetch-locations-list to have only :///files distfiles-list distfiles-recursive-list why not. It should support PATCH_FILES too. regards, clem