From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 29 23:53:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FE3106566C for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mckusick@mckusick.com) Received: from chez.mckusick.com (chez.mckusick.com [64.81.247.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E5B8FC15 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mckusick@mckusick.com) Received: from chez.mckusick.com (localhost.mckusick.com [127.0.0.1]) by chez.mckusick.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2TNrCOW094875; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:53:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mckusick@chez.mckusick.com) Message-Id: <200803292353.m2TNrCOW094875@chez.mckusick.com> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:53:12 -0700 From: Kirk McKusick Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:53:09 -0000 You should try running your experiment using ZFS. Because it is a non-overwriting filesystem, it might work better with flash. Kirk McKusick