From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 20 00:51:59 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46AB16A46C for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2C513C491 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l7K0lk1u039886; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:47:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l7K0lj63039885; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:47:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:47:45 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20070820004745.GB39765@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <46C83C2F.3060105@fpt.vn> <20070819150415.K15146@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070819150415.K15146@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, vuthecuong Subject: Re: freebsd 7 release date :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:52:00 -0000 On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 03:05:00PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > >just for reference only: > >Original release planned date of 7.0 was end of Jul. But now is nearly end > >of Aug. > >So Which date you guess 7.0 will be released? :D > > when it will be ready. if time is more important than quality for you get > simply get -current. even if not - and you would like help testing it, > fetch and report problems. There was obviously no intent to challenge or apply preasure in the question so you don't need to be snippy. If you don't have any useful information or at least information you think might be useful (qualifier for my posts) then don't bother replying - at least not snippy, posts. We can afford to be civil - expecially when a civil question is asked. The person was just noting that the old guesses were no longer operable and hoping that some new best guesses might have been made. We all know these dates are very movable and for very good reasons. No one is pushing for low quality, hurried up junk. But those best guesses by people in the know about how the processes if moving along are helpful for those of use out here in the hinterland trying to make it through each day. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"