From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 21:48:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85D016A41F for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:48:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from blue.virtual-estates.net (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4999643D45 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:48:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from blue.virtual-estates.net (blue [127.0.0.1]) by blue.virtual-estates.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j99Lm830097083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:48:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by blue.virtual-estates.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j99Lm7x4097082; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:48:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: blue.virtual-estates.net: mi set sender to mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: Mikhail Teterin To: Joe Marcus Clarke Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:48:06 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200510051413.j95EDBi2038518@blue.virtual-estates.net> <1128814097.47852.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1128814097.47852.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ${PREFIX}/include/nss/nss X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:48:10 -0000 On Saturday 08 October 2005 07:28 pm, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: = Yes, but as you pointed out, it will require changes to the = NSS-dependent ports (as well as plist changes to security/nss itself). = If you want to test all the ports, and submit a complete patch, that = would be great. I seem to vaguely recall you having a cluster capable of quickly testing things like this :-) To make things easier, how about creating a symlink: ${PREFIX}/include/nss/nss -> . ? -mi