From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 25 21:27:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from en26.local.net (froggy.anchorage.ptialaska.net [208.151.119.238]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF1A150D0 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:27:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from groggy@iname.com) Received: from en26.local.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by en26.local.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA11519 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:30:26 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from groggy@iname.com) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:30:26 -0900 (AKST) From: Steve Howe X-Sender: abc@en26.local.net Reply-To: Steve Howe To: freebsd-questions Subject: efficiency Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG i think it is generally agreed that FBSD is the fastest UN*X that will run on an Intel based PC. what is the best Xwindow that will run on FBSD? best in terms of small size, efficiency and speed. Xfree? Metro? Xig? also, why is it that many packages (apache, squid, pine to name a few) have doubled in size since their last release? this i kinda scary for those of us than continue to run on older machines like 386's and 486'swith 8 or 16M RAM ... thank you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message