From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 08:24:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3995A84A; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CF3259A; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:24:19 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0N7900H4N663PK00@hades.sorbs.net>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <539EA9B0.9050500@sorbs.net> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:24:16 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: ports/189880: port pgpool-II out of date. References: <201405170220.s4H2K0G0085365@freefall.freebsd.org> <538D0AAE.7090800@sorbs.net> <20140615111101.GM2341@home.opsec.eu> <539DA4F3.2060004@sorbs.net> <20140615142903.GQ2341@home.opsec.eu> <539DB9DD.3050603@FreeBSD.org> <20140615161122.GB2586@home.opsec.eu> <539DCCBD.7090405@FreeBSD.org> <539E14DA.3030004@sorbs.net> <539E9235.2060404@FreeBSD.org> In-reply-to: <539E9235.2060404@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:24:20 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 15/06/2014 22:49, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > >> Personally I think: >> >> databases/pgpool (3.1.x) >> databases/pgpool-devel (3.3.x) >> >>>> Given the lack of history in the ports, I'd say lets just skip >>>> pgpool-II-3.2 >>>> >> Agreed. (effectively already done) >> > > Except that pgpool-II-3.3.3 is a stable release version, and not what > would normally be considered a 'development' version. In principle for > anyone wanting to install pgpool-II for the first time the choice should > be to use version 3.3.3. I think there's a 3.4 branch that would > qualify for pgpool-II-devel if anyone wanted to write that port. Also, > the established name does seem to be 'pgpool-II' despite the 'II' being > an ersatz version number. > It caught me out on more than one occasion (and I should know better) > However, this is orthogonal to getting 3.3.3 into the tree in the first > place. Why don't we proceed with adding a databases/pgpool-II-33 port > now, and deal with indicating which one is the default and whether some > of the older versions should be removed as a separate item later? > > That was the reason I added it as a new port ;-) Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/