From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 30 17:35:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64DD106566B for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:35:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com (mail-ew0-f209.google.com [209.85.219.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522D08FC1B for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so290016ewy.37 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:34:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cy/bDjIQiyCprAfKl2JrDCw477gbiDp35wXy3tlQpq8=; b=IY8bOQBKexLvK/jlUami76t26qRGRoOlQKwX9f9dj0WcneYq6kT4NjcPiZB2nE3sug yp21l4RupxR/xcQ7l1a764C9b+dh7a+FnexHA/Zrp4n1qE1OEEo8XAkyVRfraCkDqx1/ W+/8KO42J7K61E105GO8v+a9aapMY396brARA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=xB3TsuHqIiA0JW0tL3+PtJOcrwFOkvnIkp5qjU808tPluYhrU4rGP1xRWwhcUxi8kT GruiWOOYyBwnUXtFAqn/egIMQneKwjhZFGMnAZaaYRox29czPMYpS0dPHNbmXX61fm2d G5efFSrCQr1Vo9fKIPOzgssX/HCQ0SLpR/km4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.161.22 with SMTP id n22mr1099692ebo.83.1256924099307; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:34:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6201873e0910300904v5767894bkec0e7543e28aa951@mail.gmail.com> References: <370279.86430.qm@web56502.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <6201873e0910300904v5767894bkec0e7543e28aa951@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:34:59 +0000 Message-ID: From: Freminlins To: Adam Vande More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Neil Short , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Effing HAL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:35:00 -0000 2009/10/30 Adam Vande More > > No my point was top is not accurate measure of HAL's memory usage. HAL has > shared library's just like many other applications. > Yep, I know all about that. But it is indicative. And indeed born out by the fact that when HAL is not running I get 18MB more memory free. This is only because of your misinterpretation of data and failure to RTFM. > Not entirely true. I didn't misinterpret the data - it was accurate. I didn't read the FM, but then again if HAL worked as it is meant to, I shouldn't need to. Isn't that the whole point of HAL? Starting X and finding no keyboard or mouse working is hardly what I would call success. > Adam Vande More > MF.