From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 7 16:41:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D76116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:41:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m19.mx.aol.com (imo-m19.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B4343D2F for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:41:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4525@aol.com) Received: from TM4525@aol.com by imo-m19.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id 1.198.301e6a33 (14374); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:41:28 -0400 (EDT) From: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <198.301e6a33.2e96cbb8@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:41:28 EDT To: Michael.Walker2@capita.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:41:33 -0000 In a message dated 10/7/04 10:17:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, obscurity Kris writes: Well, it's vast :) Kris We're waiting..5.3 is in beta and ready for your tests. Other benchmarks show very good results compared to 4.x. Kris ------------------------------------------ Quite a bunch of scientists on the FreeBSD team these days, eh? :) why don't you post some of these impressive benchmarks to substantiate your seemingly flimsy position? On a single processor system please, for the 99% of us who don't use SMP. Hopefully the only good reason to run 5.x won't be if you run 4 processor systems. TM