From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 11:30:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC7716A4D1 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:30:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail8.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681FC43FE1 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:30:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 10155 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2003 19:30:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 20 Nov 2003 19:30:07 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKJU3Fn031427; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:30:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3FBCF223.7050203@rodal.no> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:30:03 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Morten Rodal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic: probing for non-PCI bus X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:30:09 -0000 On 20-Nov-2003 Morten Rodal wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: >> acpu_cpu is not the same thing as CPUs listed in the MADT. If >> there is no MADT, then FreeBSD won't find any APICs and won't be >> able to trust ACPI PCI interrupt routing. In fact, ACPI will still >> be trying to route interrupts to the ATPICS, and not to the APICs if >> the MADT isn't found and used. >> > > So I *MUST* run without ACPI? (Not that much of a loss, since I'm not > using to anything, other than having to push the powerbutton and having > the computer safely shut down) Hopefully there isn't many hardware > vendors that have such a bogus ACPI implementation. Well, for now you must. I intend to fix the priorities of the drivers so that for your case the mptable PCI bridge drivers will be used instead of ACPI, and thus you can still use the rest of ACPI and it will just work out of the box. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/