From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 13:12:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7BC16A4B3 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amsfep11-int.chello.nl (amsfep11-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A298A43FA3 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:12:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dodell@sitetronics.com) Received: from sitetronics.com ([213.46.142.207]) by amsfep11-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with ESMTP id <20030916201217.LABD4496.amsfep11-int.chello.nl@sitetronics.com>; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:12:17 +0200 Message-ID: <3F676E5F.4090409@sitetronics.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:11:11 +0200 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tburress@sjca.edu References: <20030916134347.GA30359@madman.celabo.org> <20030916161121.GA91300@madman.celabo.org> <20030916164747.GA536@vista.netmemetic.com> <20030916125051.N60189@shell.inch.com> <20030916171452.GA5814@madman.celabo.org> <20030916181502.GA95772@dub.net> <3F6753ED.9020700@sitetronics.com> <20030916184035.GB6723@madman.celabo.org> <3F675FF5.2070605@sitetronics.com> <20030916155619.O9821@causasui.polity.sjca.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030916155619.O9821@causasui.polity.sjca.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH heads-up X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:12:23 -0000 tburress@sjca.edu wrote >On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > > > >>Using buffer46.patch you provided in the earlier email here (haven't >>tried the SA) I was unable to patch a 5.1-REL system -- both hunks >>failed. I think there were a couple extra comments in the header, but >>I'm not sure; I didn't look too hard. I just edited it by hand. >> >> > >I got it to work on 5.1-REL using buffer46.patch; I used the patch as it >came from the email above, and everything went smoothly. > > Ah well. Unless anybody's terribly worried that I've got some sort of horrible trojan (you know, one of those non-existant ones that turns a typecast into a rootshell), I think I'm okay. ;). --Devon