From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jun 8 13: 2:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mb2i0.ns.pitt.edu (mb2i0.ns.pitt.edu [136.142.186.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C191B37B403 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:02:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pfg1+@pitt.edu) Received: from pitt.edu ("port 1699"@[136.142.89.21]) by pitt.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #41462) with ESMTP id <01K4J36RJMHO000X8Y@mb2i0.ns.pitt.edu> for freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:02:01 EST Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 16:10:12 -0400 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Subject: Re: BSD direction/Damonnews article To: "G. Adam Stanislav" Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <3B213124.F8AE5D5A@pitt.edu> Organization: University of Pittsburgh MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en,pdf,es-CO References: <20010604200851.A65559@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3.0.6.32.20010608140211.00ae4470@mail85.pair.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "G. Adam Stanislav" wrote: > ... > > Have you considered porting it yourself? > Yes, but it's GPL'd and not critical for my interests, so I decided to pursue other, more interesting, things. I also considered porting spice-ng, but the new maintainers are so vicious about GPLing it that I decided to collect patches for the old spice. I guessed then, that if someone was really interested in spice-ng he/she would port it. No one has: the old spice and sceptre are good choices and have basicly the same features. Pedro. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message