From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 13 14: 1:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from webmail.neworleans.com (webmail.neworleans.com [204.181.176.231]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEF637B402 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:01:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail.neworleans.com (webmail.neworleans.com [204.181.176.231]) by webmail.neworleans.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA15395 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:01:51 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <91698.1013637711317.JavaMail.www@webmail.neworleans.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:01:51 -0600 (GMT-06:00) From: flash@neworleans.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: router preference: hardware or software? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What is the prevailing wisdom for the gateway between private LAN and the net: a separate hardware box (firewall/gateway/NAT) or the FreeBSD box running ipfw/natd/qmail/BIND/whatever? security? reliability? convenience? Thanks for your comments, Flash ____________________________________________________ This Message is sent via webmail.neworleans.com with UXMail. Please visit http://webmail.neworleans.com to sign up. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message