From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Jul 20  9: 3: 5 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.rz.uni-ulm.de (sirius-ether.rz.uni-ulm.de [134.60.1.36])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EAE37B858
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from siegbert.baude@gmx.de)
Received: from gmx.de (lilith.wohnheim.uni-ulm.de [134.60.106.64])
	by mail.rz.uni-ulm.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA26853
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 18:02:55 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <397722AD.427D36AE@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 18:02:53 +0200
From: Siegbert Baude <siegbert.baude@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: de, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Kernel option NO_F00F_HACK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,
is this kernel option a workaround for a known Pentium bug (feature? :-)
)?
If so did Intel remove this bug in newer chips?
Or asked in a different way: Is this option still necessary for all
generations of Pentiums from Pentium 60 to Pentium III 1 GHz?

Regards,
Siegbert


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message