From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 18 18:03:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8111D16A4CE for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:03:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5810343D1F for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:03:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (89052c317a673b84941f0ede1b7d3020@adsl-67-119-53-169.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.169])i1J234a3023943; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:03:05 -0600 (CST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6A2166D0E; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:03:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:03:03 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Phil Reynolds Message-ID: <20040219020303.GA48291@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040218115240.GA23339@tinsleyviaduct.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040218115240.GA23339@tinsleyviaduct.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports: foomatic-db-engine broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 02:03:06 -0000 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:52:40AM +0000, Phil Reynolds wrote: > On upgrading ports today, the following happened: >=20 > ** 'print/foomatic-db-engine' is marked as IGNORE: > "is marked as broken: "Fails to patch"" >=20 > Is someone working to fix this? Ask on ports@, but the answer may be 'no' since the port has no listed maintainer. In that case fixing it yourself might be the best bet.=20 Kris --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFANBlXWry0BWjoQKURAuuwAKDdUxhhV07JvkLtkUhwJ8qvO9TWWgCgydK8 e1NTJbSRUCTuZuV0es9yTOM= =Bn3I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--