From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 15:10:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0642D1065672 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83C78FC0C for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n04FA2dK063205 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n04FA2uw063204; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:10:02 GMT Message-Id: <200901041510.n04FA2uw063204@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Alexander Leidinger Cc: Subject: Re: ports/108795: ports/icc: Proposed update to icc port for intel compiler 9.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexander Leidinger List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:10:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/108795; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Leidinger To: Stefan Walter Cc: Simon Robbins , GNATS , Eric De La Cruz Lugo Subject: Re: ports/108795: ports/icc: Proposed update to icc port for intel compiler 9.1 Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:44:38 +0100 Quoting Stefan Walter (from Sun, 4 Jan 2009 =20 14:02:14 +0100): > Hi Simon, hi Alexander, > > please see the message quoted below. Any news on the icc update [1]? I don't have the time to have a look at porting it (not much spare =20 time). In case I get some time, my priorities are somewhere else. I =20 should be able to review (but not test) patches. I can also answer =20 questions. Regarding the comment in the PR: I am not aware of a native icc =20 version for FreeBSD. Until icc 8.x I was the main contact regarding =20 icc on the FreeBSD side. My main contact at Intels side was not =20 directly in the compiler group, he was in the embedded systems group =20 back then, but the compiler group was helpful via the official icc bug =20 report channel. If there's some native icc version in the works for =20 FreeBSD, then it is not me who knows about it. In case someone is =20 aware of some ongoing work in this regard, I could provide some =20 background infos which may or may not speed up the work. Bye, Alexander. > Regards, > Stefan > > [1]: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/108795 > > ----- Forwarded message from Eric De La Cruz Lugo =20 > ----- > > From: Eric De La Cruz Lugo > Subject: icc Current Status > To: stefan@freebsd.org > Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org > Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:39:32 -0800 (PST) > >> Hi, Stefan: >> I >> was wondering about the Status for the intel Compiler "icc V. 10 " , >> there are any news about it? >> I am into a cluster (HPC) project for this Year (2009), and am trying to >> install FreeBSD 7 or 6.4 at least, but one requierement for the Physics >> and Math Guys is the Intel Compiler. >> >> Thanks in advance on this. >> Eric De La Cruz Lugo >> Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > --=20 http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 Electrical Engineers do it with less resistance.