From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 24 06:47:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA01015 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 06:47:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA00986 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 06:46:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.1/Spinner) with ESMTP id VAA20850; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 21:46:23 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199809241346.VAA20850@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Andre Oppermann cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/3.0-19980923-BETA/ In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Sep 1998 12:37:08 +0200." <360A20D4.45A2010C@pipeline.ch> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 21:46:22 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andre Oppermann wrote: > Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > -snip- > > There's a swift current right now (groan), so if you don't subscribe > > to cvs-all, now might be an excellent time to do so, at least during > > the extent of the BETA period. :) > > That would kill me :( > > I'd like to see at least the base FreeBSD and Ports cvs lists separated. > > I fall on my knees and pray to you: please, please do this list. Hmm.. This isn't out of the question.. It looks like the split (by subtree) mailing lists got killed while I was away. Is there a need for (say): cvs-all (all commits) cvs-30 (all commits related to 3.0 (aka -current, -beta, -stable etc) cvs-22 (all commits related to 2.2.x (aka 2.2-stable etc) cvs-ports (ports commits) cvs-www (www tree) ie: - a commit to src/* in -current would go to cvs-all and cvs-30. - a commit to docs/* would go to cvs-all, cvs-22, cvs-30 (since it's used in both branches - the docs area is not branched) - a commit to ports/* would go to cvs-all and cvs-ports. Would this be useful? Too much? Too little? THis is different to what we had before where commits to all branches were lumped in together. > ;-) > -- > Andre Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message