From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 9 18:04:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DFA16A56E; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:04:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B77B43D31; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:04:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) Received: from [10.70.0.244] (daemon.mj.niksun.com [10.70.0.244]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j19I4JUP067932; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:04:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) From: Jung-uk Kim Organization: Niksun, Inc. To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, cokane@cokane.org Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:04:17 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <42068A5C.1030300@root.org> <42090EBE.1030202@root.org> <346a802205020909273c413d03@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <346a802205020909273c413d03@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502091304.17896.jkim@niksun.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: cpufreq import complete, acpi_throttling changed X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:04:52 -0000 On Wednesday 09 February 2005 12:27 pm, Coleman Kane wrote: > Ooops. Sorry, I knew this. Uhm in that case, is the acpi_ppc driver > being brought in, or similar functionality? I really like the > auto-scaling that ppc does. We will be able to write a simple daemon to do the job, something like cpufreqd: http://cpufreqd.sourceforge.net/ That's what the API is for... Thanks, Jung-uk Kim > On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:10:54 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > > Coleman Kane wrote: > > > I have the same problem. Looking through the code, it looks > > > like the throttling code from acpi_cpu.c basically got moved > > > into acpi_perf.c. > > > > No. acpi throttling code moved to acpi_throttle.c. acpi_perf.c > > is a new driver. In any case, a powernow.c driver will > > eventually be committed to provide this functionality. You can > > keep using acpi_ppc for now. > > > > -- > > Nate