From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jan 16 17:26:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from inet03.citec.qld.gov.au (inet03.citec.qld.gov.au [203.5.10.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15501514B for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 17:26:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au) Received: by inet03.citec.qld.gov.au; id LAA19363; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:26:35 +1000 (EST) Received: from guru.citec.qld.gov.au( 147.132.20.47) by inet03.citec.qld.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma019336; Mon, 17 Jan 00 11:26:33 +1000 Received: from localhost (sgcccdc@localhost) by guru.citec.qld.gov.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA11348; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:27:07 +1000 X-Authentication-Warning: guru.citec.qld.gov.au: sgcccdc owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:27:07 +1000 (EST) From: Colin Campbell To: Intranova Networking Group Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Hmmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, If xl0 is internal then my guess is that someone has put a pc on your lan with an IP address of 216.174.91.28 and a netmask of 255.255.255.224 which makes 216.174.91.31 the broadcast address for the subnet. If xl0 is external then I'm not really sure why you are seeing those packets since xl0 is apparently not on 216.174.91.0. Colin On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Intranova Networking Group wrote: > If you're connected to a hub then that means someone else on that hub has > address space in that area, otherwise, something's barfing on you. > > Omachonu Ogali > Intranova Networking Group > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Brian Gallucci wrote: > > > This is really weird -> > > > > ipfw: 1800 Deny UDP 216.174.91.28:138 216.174.91.31:138 in via xl0 ............ > > ipfw: 1800 Deny UDP 216.174.91.28:138 216.174.91.31:138 in via xl0 > > Colin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message